Los Angeles Times political writer Andrew Malcolm has a biting take on the draft executive order to require additional disclosure regulations:
What could possibly go wrong with that kind of information in a nonpartisan place like Washington?
Now the Obama White House is considering an executive order to create a back-door donor disclosure requirement for companies seeking federal contracts. According to the leaked draft, the order would require contract applicants to disclose any political donations exceeding $5,000 by the corporation or its executives, often Republican supporters.
As it happens, the Wall Street Journal has noted, the draft executive order would not apply to recipients of federal grants or to federal employee unions, often Democratic supporters. Probably just an oversight.
The White House points to the increasing flow of millions of dollars into political activities via third-party groups that are not required to disclose their donors’ identities. Hence the sudden administration interest in transparency.
Critics claim that it’s an end-run around Congress, whose elected members and substantial Democratic majorities defeated similar disclosure legislation last year. And that it’s simply a Chicago-style intimidation tactic to deter those who desire federal work with this Democratic administration from the disgusting habit of donating to GOP members and causes.
This is, of course, a ridiculous suggestion… [E]veryone should accept that this upcoming political Obama executive order is simply about good government and bureaucratic integrity — except for one tiny, silly, little thing.
Most federal contracts are supposed to go to the lowest bidder, regardless of political donations, connections, hometown or hat size. So why would Obama’s South Side gang need to know any company’s political allegiance?