In the News: Washington Post (LTE): The IRS Should Not be the Speech Police

Washington Post (LTE): The IRS Should Not be the Speech Police

By Luke Wachob

In her May 21 op-ed column, “Illuminating dark money,” Ruth Marcus ignored perhaps the most important question surrounding recent Internal Revenue Service efforts to restrict the activities of social welfare organizations: Should we regulate political speech through an independent, bipartisan agency with expertise in First Amendment law — the Federal Election Commission — or through a tax collection agency under the control of the president?

The tea-party-targeting scandal that’s still being investigated should be proof enough that the IRS is fundamentally ill-equipped to police political speech. The service’s national taxpayer advocate, Nina Olson, even wrote in June in a report to Congress, “It may be advisable to separate political determinations from the function of revenue collection.”

Read more…

The Center for Competitive Politics is now the Institute for Free Speech.