CCP Testimony on “The Feasibility of Converting to a Public Financing Model for Elections in the District of Columbia”

There are a number of issues highlighted in the statement: (I) recent corruption scandals in Washington D.C. would be unaffected by the existence of a tax-financing program; (II) New York City’s matching funds program is fraught with corruption; (III) similar programs in Arizona and Maine have also experienced much corruption; (IV) a recent academic study found no evidence that these programs decrease the incidence of public corruption; (V) an analysis of Connecticut’s taxpayer financing program has demonstrated its failure to change legislative voting patterns; (VI) existing statewide programs have done little to diminish alleged “interest group” influence; (VII) most other claims by advocates of “clean elections” have been shown to be false; and (VIII) the cost of such a citywide program in Washington D.C. is likely to be expensive and rise in cost over time.

Read full testimony here.

The Center for Competitive Politics is now the Institute for Free Speech.