The Hill: Did you enjoy ‘Fire and Fury’? Thank Citizens United for it (In the News)

The Hill: Did you enjoy ‘Fire and Fury’? Thank Citizens United for it

By David Keating and Thomas Wheatley

Wolff’s book is indisputably speech funded by a corporation and is scathingly critical of President Trump. Had the Citizens United turned out differently, the Federal Election Commission (FEC), with just an administrative sleight of hand, could have constitutionally placed Wolff’s publisher in the agency’s crosshairs.

It does not matter the book was released in January, far removed from any primary or general election. Express advocacy paid for by a corporation’s general treasury funds was banned regardless of proximity to an election. Although the book makes no explicit calls for voters to support or oppose Trump, it could easily be argued that it is the “functional equivalent” of express advocacy because it “is susceptible of no reasonable interpretation other than as an appeal to vote for or against a specific candidate.” And Trump has already declared his candidacy for 2020.

What’s more, when deciding whether a communication constituted express advocacy, the FEC, prior to Citizens United, looked for whether the communication took a position on an “office holder’s character, qualifications, or fitness for office.” …

Although Citizens United concerned an electioneering communication, the broader ban on corporations using general treasury funds for express advocacy struck down by the Court applied to all forms of media – including books.

The Center for Competitive Politics is now the Institute for Free Speech.