Blog

Buckley v. Valeo confines campaign finance regulation to actual corruption, rather than amorphous claims about “undue influence.”

Those who blame Buckley for our current problems are wrong to do so. A contrary decision would have made things worse.

The Institute for Free Speech held a virtual panel with Bradley A. Smith, Joel Gora, and Eugene Volokh to reflect on the history of ...

Despite sustained criticism from all sides, Buckley's core principle persists: government cannot ration political speech.

The core First Amendment principles of Buckley v. Valeo endure after fifty years.

Experts and scholars reflect on Buckley’s legacy on the decision’s fiftieth anniversary

James L. Buckley, et al. v. Francis R. Valeo, Secretary of the United States Senate, et al. argued before the Supreme Court of the United ...

This blog post will provide updates on the states that have enacted new or improved existing anti-SLAPP laws since the September 2025 publication of ...

Michigan has officially joined the ranks of states providing robust protections against frivolous, speech-chilling litigation.

The Institute for Free Speech – the nation's only organization dedicated solely to defending political speech rights – is seeking a visionary leader to ...