Policy Primer: Taxpayer-Financed Campaigns – A Costly and Failed Policy

July 16, 2014   •  By Matt Nese   •    •  

Often euphemistically referred to as “clean elections” or public financing, taxpayer-financed campaign programs seek to replace private, voluntary contributions from citizens to their favored candidates with government grants of taxpayer dollars to candidates who meet certain requirements. Commonly promoted as a cure-all for improving government and reducing corruption, an evaluation of Arizona, Connecticut, and Maine’s statewide and New York City’s citywide taxpayer-financed campaign programs cast serious doubt on proponents’ claims.

As this Policy Primer on taxpayer-funded campaigns explains, Contrary to advocates’ claims, in practice, these programs: (1) contain alarming amounts of corruption; (2) relatedly, fail to decrease the incidence of public corruption; (3) fail to change legislative voting patterns or reduce lobbyist influence; (4) fail to promote electoral competitiveness; (5) fail to increase either occupational diversity or female representation in legislatures; (6) fail to result in financial savings to taxpayers; and (7) fail to improve voter turnout or trust in government.

Additionally, taxpayer-financed campaign programs are costly and have been shown to carry a continually increasing price tag over time. When the costs and the nature of these programs are explained, the public generally does not support the government giving tax dollars to politicians to pay for their campaigns. In Arizona’s case, many observers have noted that the state’s tax-financed campaign program has produced one of the most polarized state legislatures in the country, despite claims by advocates that replacing private contributions with taxpayer funds would reduce extremism.

From inherent constitutional concerns to the potential to exacerbate existing corruption issues, state policymakers should not view tax-financed campaign proposals as a solution to perceived problems in government.

For an in-depth explanation of this oft-touted, but severely flawed issue, please read the Institute for Free Speech’s Policy Primer on taxpayer-financed campaigns here.


Matt Nese

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap