Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a 2010 Supreme Court decision that restored some of the First Amendment rights of corporations and unions that had been restricted under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. The case was brought by Citizens United, a nonprofit organization that wished to advertise and distribute a documentary film critical of Hillary Clinton in…
The American Constitution Society held a conference Friday on money in politics. The panel, “Citizens United Two Years Later: Money, Politics and Democracy at Stake,” featured CCP ...
The Montana Supreme Court won national attention recently when it decided that the First Amendment does not fully protect the speech and association rights of ...
Two years and two election cycles into the Super PAC era, the media firestorm against free speech and association has been palpable. A Google search ...
Two years and two election cycles into the Super PAC era, the media firestorm against free speech and association has been palpable. A Google search ...
CCP submitted comments to the FEC regarding the Citizens United decision.
This paper seeks to understand the effect of campaign finance laws on electoral and policy outcomes. Spurred by the recent Supreme Court decision, Citizens United ...
With the second anniversary of the Citizens United decision coming up this Saturday, reform groups are pulling out all the stops to protest the decision. ...
In the wake of last year’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the scope of political speech protected under the ...
In the much discussed Citizens United v. FEC case, the Supreme Court overturned existing prohibitions on corporate political expenditures and recognized that outright prohibitions on ...
In the wake of last year’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC, the scope of political speech protected under the First Amendment ...