Receive The Latest Updates

Featured Content

NAACP v. Alabama: When “Transparency” Becomes Censorship

NAACP v. Alabama: When “Transparency” Becomes Censorship

In order for civic groups to be effective, Americans must be able to associate with their fellow citizens
privately. People behave differently when they are being watched, and this is especially true when people are monitored by the very government they are trying to reform. The right to privacy is therefore essential to the protection of First Amendment freedoms. To understand the vital relationship between privacy rights and freedom of association, we need only look to the landmark 1958 Supreme Court case, NAACP v. Alabama.

Read More

Did a D.C. Federal Court Fail the “Major Purpose Test”?

Did a D.C. Federal Court Fail the “Major Purpose Test”?

A recent opinion by Judge Christopher R. Cooper of the federal District Court in Washington, D.C. poses new risks for advocacy groups and their supporters. The ruling erodes a constitutional limitation on the power of the government to compel Americans speaking about policy issues to register themselves as political committees (PACs) with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

Read More

First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti: Protecting the Right to Hear Others

First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti: Protecting the Right to Hear Others

Can the government silence speech about an election simply because the speaker is a corporation? Can it deny voters the opportunity to hear a corporation’s views on issues? Forty years ago, the Supreme Court answered no in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti.

Read More v. Federal Election Commission: Protecting the First Amendment Rights of Americans v. Federal Election Commission: Protecting the First Amendment Rights of Americans

If one person can speak about a candidate without limit, can Congress ban two, three, or hundreds of people from joining together to do the same? That was the simple question presented in the case v. Federal Election Commission. Fortunately, a unanimous 2010 D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision said no, such a limit would violate the First Amendment. Americans can now form independent expenditure groups to raise and spend money on campaign speech without limits. Learn more about this important case.

Read More

Understanding Super PACs

Understanding Super PACs

You’ve probably heard the term tossed around over the past couple of years, but what exactly is a “super PAC”? These organizations have been given a bad name by their competitors – powerful politicians and media corporations – who previously held a monopoly on political speech. However, the reality is much different than what opponents of free speech would have you believe. Check out the Institute’s newest infographic to understand what super PACs are really about.

Read More

Latest Updates

Nation of Change: IRS changes rules to critical disclosure requirements (In the News)

NPR: Trump Administration Weakens Political Nonprofit Disclosures (In the News)

Capital Research Center: InfluenceWatch Podcast Episode #33: The IRS Protects Free Speech? (In the News)

Setting the Record Straight: A Response to CLC’s Attacks on Judge Kavanaugh

State Policy Network: Connecticut to candidates: Don’t talk about the Governor, or else (In the News)

FEC: Public hearing on internet disclaimers (In the News)

Washington Post: ‘Dark money’ groups don’t need to disclose donors to IRS, Treasury says (In the News)

NPR: Dark Money Groups Get A Little Darker, Thanks To IRS (In the News)

Roll Call: IRS Ruling on Political Donation Reporting Sets Off Campaign Finance Fight (In the News)

Daily Caller: Political ‘Dark Money’ Goes Pitch Black In IRS And Treasury Rule Change (In the News)

2018 May Be the Year of the Political Outsider, No Thanks to Campaign Finance “Reform”

IFS Praises IRS Reforms to Protect Donor Information

Heartland Institute: San Antonio Increases Campaign Finance Reporting Requirements (In the News)

Washington Examiner: FEC ‘compromise’ could threaten free speech online (In the News)

Puget Sound Business Journal: Opinion: Google’s political ad ban gives incumbents a big boost (In the News)

The Intercept: Brett Kavanaugh, Who Has Ruled Against Campaign Finance Regulations, Could Bring an Avalanche of Big Money to Elections (In the News)

PR Watch: Democrats Reintroduce DISCLOSE Act to Combat Dark Money “Poison” (In the News)

Spectrum News: NAACP vs. Alabama (Video) (In the News)

Capital Research Center: Required Donor Disclosure: A Threat to the First Amendment (In the News)

SCOTUSblog: Reactions to the Kavanaugh nomination (In the News)

Latest Tweets

Find Recent Political Speech Developments

The Center for Competitive Politics is now the Institute for Free Speech.