Receive The Latest Updates

Featured Content

Court Ruling on Independent Expenditures Creates New Risks for Groups

Court Ruling on Independent Expenditures Creates New Risks for Groups

A recent federal district court ruling threw out a long-standing Federal Election Commission independent expenditure donor reporting rule. There are many unanswered questions about the impact and reach of the decision. Some of these questions raise very serious First Amendment concerns about associational and donor privacy.

Read More

NAACP v. Alabama: When “Transparency” Becomes Censorship

NAACP v. Alabama: When “Transparency” Becomes Censorship

In order for civic groups to be effective, Americans must be able to associate with their fellow citizens
privately. People behave differently when they are being watched, and this is especially true when people are monitored by the very government they are trying to reform. The right to privacy is therefore essential to the protection of First Amendment freedoms. To understand the vital relationship between privacy rights and freedom of association, we need only look to the landmark 1958 Supreme Court case, NAACP v. Alabama.

Read More

Did a D.C. Federal Court Fail the “Major Purpose Test”?

Did a D.C. Federal Court Fail the “Major Purpose Test”?

A recent opinion by Judge Christopher R. Cooper of the federal District Court in Washington, D.C. poses new risks for advocacy groups and their supporters. The ruling erodes a constitutional limitation on the power of the government to compel Americans speaking about policy issues to register themselves as political committees (PACs) with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

Read More

First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti: Protecting the Right to Hear Others

First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti: Protecting the Right to Hear Others

Can the government silence speech about an election simply because the speaker is a corporation? Can it deny voters the opportunity to hear a corporation’s views on issues? Forty years ago, the Supreme Court answered no in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti.

Read More

SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission: Protecting the First Amendment Rights of Americans

SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission: Protecting the First Amendment Rights of Americans

If one person can speak about a candidate without limit, can Congress ban two, three, or hundreds of people from joining together to do the same? That was the simple question presented in the case SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission. Fortunately, a unanimous 2010 D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision said no, such a limit would violate the First Amendment. Americans can now form independent expenditure groups to raise and spend money on campaign speech without limits. Learn more about this important case.

Read More

Latest Updates

Advocacy Groups: Made from Love

Boston Herald Radio: Brad Smith Former Federal Election Commission Chair (Audio) (In the News)

WBUR Boston NPR: Question 2 Wants Mass. Voters To Take A Stand Against Citizens United – If Only A Symbolic One (In the News)

Ballot Access News: U.S. District Court Judge Enjoins South Dakota Campaign Finance Disclosure Law for Institute for Free Speech (In the News)

Institute for Free Speech Wins Legal Challenge, Publishes Analysis of South Dakota Constitutional Amendment W and Initiated Measure 24

First Amendment Analysis: South Dakota Ballot Measures

Sioux Falls Argus Leader: Free speech group can publish ballot information ahead of election, federal judge rules (In the News)

Idaho Press-Tribune: Lawmakers debate free speech, privacy, transparency, as they craft campaign reforms (In the News)

Keloland News: Federal Judge Makes Ruling In The Institute For Free Speech Case (In the News)

Soapbox Cincinnati: Civics Essential: How dark money, negative ads & campaign finance impact Ohioans at the ballot box (In the News)

Comments to National Park Service on Proposed Rule Regarding Demonstrations and Special Events in the National Capital Region, 83 Fed. Reg. 40460 (Aug. 15, 2018)

State Policy Network: Institute for Free Speech sues South Dakota for right to analyze ballot measures (In the News)

Taunton Daily Gazette: Beacon Hill Roll Call: Mass. Fiscal Alliance files suit against AG Healey, OCPF, over campaign finance law (In the News)

Keloland News: Federal Judge Hears The Institute For Free Speech Case (In the News)

The Howie Carr Show: Unions, Elections And More – 10.11.18 (Hour 4) (In the News)

MassLive: Mass Fiscal Alliance sues state over donor disclosure requirements (In the News)

Courthouse News Service: Opponents of Millionaire Tax Fight Massachusetts Disclosure Rules (In the News)

Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance Sues State Over Compelled Speech Requirements

Keloland News: Institute For Free Speech Files Lawsuit Regarding Two South Dakota Ballot Issues (In the News)

USA Today: Out-of-state donors are pouring cash into local campaigns of Democrats across the country (In the News)

Latest Tweets

Find Recent Political Speech Developments

The Center for Competitive Politics is now the Institute for Free Speech.