IFS Chairman Bradley A. Smith Criticizes “Cynicism” of S. 1 in Opening Statement at Senate Rules Committee Hearing

March 24, 2021   •  By Luke Wachob   •    •  , , , , , ,

At a March 24 hearing before the U.S. Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, Institute for Free Speech Chairman Bradley A. Smith warned that S. 1, and its House counterpart H.R. 1, would violate the First Amendment and damage American democracy. Watch Smith’s opening statement below, and click here to read his full written testimony.

“The cynicism of the ‘For the Politicians Act’ is highlighted by two provisions,” Smith said. “The bill claims not to use taxpayer money to fund elections. It then immediately sets up a system using taxpayer money to fund elections. The bill provides that the system will be paid for with fines, penalties, and the sale of government assets, but all of this is taxpayer money, and all of us know that. How cynical is it to claim that the funds of the U.S. government are not taxpayer money?”

“Next is the change in the FEC from a bipartisan organization to an agency under partisan control,” Smith continued. “How cynical is this? All morning long through the first panel, I listened to one member after another of this Committee insist that we had to pass S. 1 to do away with partisan redistricting. But apparently, we need to pass S. 1 to get partisan enforcement of campaign finance laws.

“If I wanted to foster distrust in American elections, I could think of few better ways to do it than to change the FEC from a bipartisan to a partisan organization. S. 1 would put the FEC under effective partisan control of the Democratic Party through at least the 2026 midterms – longer if a Democrat is elected president in 2024.”

Totaling over 800 pages, S. 1 contains numerous unconstitutional and harmful provisions suppressing speech. It would publicly expose Americans’ support for social causes, restrict political speech on the internet, force speakers to include lengthy government disclaimers exposing their supporters in their messages when speaking about policy issues, transform the bipartisan Federal Election Commission into a partisan agency under the president’s control, and subsidize the campaigns of House and Senate candidates at the cost of billions of dollars each election cycle.

All of the Institute’s analyses and resources related to H.R. 1 and S. 1 are available here.

Luke Wachob

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap